I've heard from older, experienced professors that doing a dissertation on or specializing in philosophy of religion may hurt your chances of getting a philosophy job or getting tenure at a secular university. It's better to focus on some other subject and then do philosophy of religion after you get tenure.
Is this true? If so, why? It doesn't make sense to me; it seems that schools would want professors who could teach philosophy of religion.
I'm going to teach a course on Science and Religion in the fall for the first time. The course presupposes no (or very little) prior background in philosophy. I was amazed at the number of interesting books that resulted from a search on Amazon using the keywords 'science' and 'religion.' It's hard to know where to begin to sort them out. If some of you could recommend texts on science and religion that you think are excellent, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
James Beebe
One of the assignments I give to my philosophy of religion course is to have students write a paper reflecting on the impact of philosophy on their own religious beliefs. As preparation for this paper, I have them read a number of select autobiographies from God and Philosophers and Philosophers who Believe. This term, I've added a number of chapters from the recently published Philosophers without Gods (this is the volume that has the wonderful paper by the late David Lewis, "Divine Evil," that Michael has mentioned on his blog).
While at the Eastern APA, I picked up Faith and the Life of the Intellect, which is in the same vein, but with contributions by Catholic philosophers working primarily in the Continental tradition. My favorite line in the volume comes from Ralph McInerny:
"It matters who you hang out with philosophically" (239).
But I'm slightly puzzled by a quotation from the chapter by Jude Dougherty:
"Luther had little regard for philosophy. Sworn enemy of Scholasticism, he once remarked that God had sent Aristotle as a punishment for the sins of mankind" (172).
Does anyone know where in Luther's corpus this comment is found?
I'm teaching an upper-division course in the spring on Aquinas. I'm going to try and devote a third of the course to Aquinas' philosophical theology, a third to his metaphysics, and a third to his ethics. Pretty soon I'm going to have to put in my book orders. I think that I'm going to use the Cambridge Companion to Aquinas and either The Philosophy of Aquinas or Aquinas's Summa Theologiae: Critical Essays. But before I order them, I wondered if there are any other candidates that I'm overlooking and should consider. (Let me note that I am quite familiar with Stump's Aquinas, but think that the level of complexity here is greater than what I should tackle in this course.)
Also, I'm considering either using The Treatise on Human Nature or Summa Theologiae: Questions on God. Any thoughts on which is the better translation (where 'better' is a function of both more accurate and readability for undergraduates)?
I teach a 300-level philosophy of religion class every spring semester. In the past, I've tended to teach the class as an overview of the various issues. I'll spend a little over half of the semester on various standards such as religious language, pluralism vs. exclusivism, attributes, a few of the arguments for God's exsitence (cosmological, ontological), a few of the arguments against God's existence (evil, hiddenness). I then spend the final 1/3 or so of the class dealing with issues of providence: risk vs. no-risk, whether foreknowledge of various sorts helps with providence, hell/heaven/purgatory, prayer. A previous copy of my syllabus can be found here in case you are interested.
I'm thinking about changing the structure this semester. I'd still focus the first part of the semester on many of the same issues, but try and keep them to no more than half of the course. The second half, I'd like to compare/contrast two extended views of God and His providential interacting with the world. I'm thinking of using Roger's Perfect Being Theology and would like a good contrasting view. I think that the middle chapters of Flint's Divine Providence will be too technical. I like Hasker's God, Time and Knowledge, but it's narrower in focus than I want. I was thinking about doing a book defending open theism and so took a look at The Openness of God this weekend. I'm only half through the book, but I've been very dissapointed. Any other suggestions?
Joe Ulatowski is preparing to teach his first philosophy of religion course and he's seeking some input on how to proceed. Should he go topical or historical, lecture or discussion, what topics should he focus on? I know some of Prosblogion's readers could lend him a hand. So, please take a moment to share your wise council with Joe.
I'm going to be teaching an ancient and medieval course for the first time this summer. I think I'll be fine on the ancient stuff. I'm planning to use Julia Annas' anthology that organizes readings by topics. I'm required to cover Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, and Descartes(!), but I'd like to focus a good deal on the Hellenistics and Augustine as well, and I hope to do a bit on the pre-Socratics as well. I think I'm good on the ancients and ok on Augustine, as long as I can find my notes from the Hellenistic seminar Bonnie Kent did in her one graduate course in her one year at Syracuse (she spent the last two weeks on City of God).
What I don't have much of a sense with is what to do with the medievals beyond Augustine or how to integrate him with the others (besides the Hellenistics, which I could do passably). Does anyone know of any good resources for teaching medieval philosophy, preferably online? Does anyone have any ideas as to how to integrate the later people with the earlier ones? Annas' book organizes topically, and I'd prefer to do the whole course that way and not just for the ancient portion and then by philosopher from then on. I refuse to do the theory of forms or problem of universals in an introductory course, and much of what people talk about is related to that. Any ideas? I'm also interested in any insight into particular sections of Augustine or Aquinas that would tie in with the other philosophers I'll be dealing with, so if anyone knows of a convenient list of those I'd appreciate it.
