For those unfamiliar Ars Disputandi is an online journal for the philosophy of religion. Like any journal it publishes refereed articles, discussion notes, and book reviews. One advantage over traditional journals is that submissions that are accepted for publication are immediately published online. A serious upside is that the peer review process has a fast turnaround when compared to print journals. One downside is that most online journals do not have the established reputation of print journals. Perhaps this will change over time as more people choose to submit quality work to places like AD. What follows are the most recent additions to the journal.
Article:
Divine Foreknowledge, Harry Frankfurt, and 'Hyper-Incompatibilism' By David Werther
Book reviews:
Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward a More Perfect Form of Existence By John P. O'Callaghan review by Eileen Sweeney
Gregory of Nyssa and the Concept of Divine Persons By Lucian Turcescu review by Richard Cross
Manifest Activity: Thomas Reid's Theory of Action By Gideon Yaffe review by Sabine Roeser
Divinity and Maximal Greatness By Daniel J. Hill review by Vincent Brümmer
Buddhism, Knowledge and Liberation: A Philosophical Study By David Burton review by Jeffrey Timm
Being Given: Towards a Phenomenology of Givenness By Jean-Luc Marion review by Cynthia R. Nielsen
The God Who May Be: A Hermeneutics of Religion By Richard Kearney review by Lieven Boeve
Vakfilosofie van de geloofswetenschap By A. Troost review by Gijsbert van den Brink
The Cultures of Creationism: Anti-Evolutionism in English-Speaking Countries Edited by Simon Coleman and Leslie Carlin review by Taede Smedes
Aquinas on Being By Anthony Kenny review by Rudi te Velde
Rationality and Religious Theism By Joshua L. Golding review by N. Verbin
Yes, Ars Disputandi is a brilliant online journal! The site looks beautiful and its articles and reviews are mostly of high quality (due to the dedicated efforts of the editor, Maarten Wisse), and to me it's surprising that this journal is so often simply ignored. Perhaps especially the older generation in the academia is still unwilling or simply incapable of opening up to other media for displaying research. In other words: Ars Disputandi suffers from not being taken seriously. My guess is that this is the case for many online journals. Perhaps the situation will change in the (near?) future. I definitely hope that Ars Disputandi will continue its activities - and I hope that many scholars working in the field of theology, philosophy of religion, theology & science, and related fields will pay attention to and will contribute to this journal.