I'm in the middle of writing a piece on hell for an Oxford Handbook. The last material I've seen on the subject is the interchange between Talbott and Murray, as well as the interchange between Walls and Talbott (all on universalism). There's also Sider's piece on hell and vagueness, arguing that hell will have to be unjust because its not vague whether you go there but it has to be vague whether one has done anything that deserves being sent there.
Anyone know of other new stuff on hell?
There was a good discussion of Ted's paper at Brian Weatherson's blog. I don't know if you want to count that sort of thing, but it was a fairly in-depth discussion, once people got beyond the joking nature of Brian's post.
I just went and checked on it, and apparently most of the comments got deleted in his move to the new site. Only the first comment remains. That's too bad. Here's the link anyway. There's also no way the current date is right, because the comment is from the previous month.
Jeremy: I found the link to the Sider discussion. It's here:
http://tar.weatherson.net/archives/000184.html
Thanks for reminding me of it!
That's it, but most of the discussion isn't there. There had been at least ten comments, including two or three by me, and they didn't survive the migration to the new site.
There is an exchange between Jerry Walls and Thomas Talbott on Hell in the June 2004 issue of "Religious Studies". The exchange also has a bibliographic reference to a recent book of articles defending (and attacking) Talbott's universalism.
You might be interested in checking out the exchange in the recent Blackwell Contemporary Debates in Phil of Religion volume. I think it is between Tallbot and Walls.